Amirkhamza Nasridinov vs Braden Shick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Aug at 10:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nasridinov vs B. Shick

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nasridinov 1 - 0 Shick
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amirkhamza Nasridinov winning 2 and Braden Shick winning 0. The last match between Amirkhamza Nasridinov and Braden Shick was at the M15 Huntsville, 13-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Amirkhamza Nasridinov getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nasridinov | 1 |
| Shick | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Huntsville(08-13-25)
A. Nasridinov vs B. Shick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 70.37% (19-8) | Career Total W/L | 58.67% (44-31) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Nasridinov vs B. Shick Match Preview:
- Analyzing recent performance, Shick has an advantage in second serve points won (46.6%) over Nasridinov (43.33%). Could this suggest a stronger baseline game from Shick?
- Return stats highlight Shick's superiority in winning points on opponents' second serves (43.07%) compared to Nasridinov (40%). However, Nasridinov leads on first serve returns (28.57% vs. 25.11%). What does this indicate about their playing strategies?
- Under pressure, Nasridinov excels at saving breakpoints, achieving a 63.64% success rate compared to Shick’s 52.69%. Could this resilience be pivotal?
- In terms of overall match results in the past year, Nasridinov shows a remarkable win rate of 83.33%, while Shick maintains a 60% win rate. Does this give Nasridinov the edge in terms of consistency?
- Both players have shown strong performances on clay, with Nasridinov having a flawless record (100%) compared to Shick's solid 80% on the same surface. Can their clay dominance affect the match outcome?
- Nasridinov's competition average rank was 291.33, slightly below Shick's 264.15, suggesting Shick may face tougher opponents. How might this influence their competitiveness?
- For matches extending to a decisive set, Nasridinov has a 100% success rate, vastly outperforming Shick's 38%. Will this prove decisive if the match tightens?
- Shick leads in breakpoint conversion (34.38% vs. 20%), indicating potentially strategic play when critical opportunities arise.
Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features two competitive players, each with distinct strengths that could influence the outcome. Shick's stronger second serve performance and ability to convert breakpoints could provide a strategic upper hand, especially during pivotal match moments.
Nasridinov, however, showcases resilience in breakpoint situations and boasts an impressive overall win rate. Their exceptional performance in deciding sets could be crucial if the match becomes closely contested.
Despite Shick's slight edge in terms of recent competition level and strategic breakpoint play, Nasridinov's consistency and ability to perform under pressure tilt the prediction in their favor. Thus, Nasridinov is more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis clash.
Amirkhamza Nasridinov vs Braden Shick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nasridinov vs B. Shick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:40:26 | Average Match Time | 1:40:26 |
| 59% (27/46) | 1st Serve % | 58% (37/64) |
| 85% (23/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (29/64) | Return Points Win % | 20% (9/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Nasridinov Recent Matches Played
B. Shick Recent Matches Played

A. Nasridinov vs B. Shick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.37% (19/8) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.67% (44/31) |
| 63.49% (40/23) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.75% (94/66) |
| 55.12% (334/272) | Games Win/Loss | 54.12% (801/679) |
| 66.67% (14/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.90% (33/25) |
| 83.33% (5/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 33 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 31 | Total Double Faults | 115 |
| 1:16:55 | Average Match Time | 1:4:21 |
| 295.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 293.33 |
| 59% (711/1204) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1754/3047) |
| 67% (476/711) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1227/1754) |
| 54% (267/493) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (654/1293) |
| 38% (70/182) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (125/281) |
| 44% (605/1367) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1148/2969) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 70.37% (19/8) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (43/25) |
| 69% (18/26) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (43/73) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
| 70% (7/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 81% (16/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (44/41) |
| 19% (16/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (44/3) |
| 55% (11/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (31/3) |